C Shanita Bradley v. Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Ctr Inc
C Shanita Bradley v. Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Ctr Inc
Opinion
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
SHANITA BRADLEY, ERICA CHAPPELL, UNPUBLISHED ANGELA HAMM, and BARBARA KEMP, April 25, 2024 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 365526 Wayne Circuit Court LC No. 22-006362-CK FOUNTAIN BLEU HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC, Defendant-Appellee.
Before: RIORDAN, P.J., and O’BRIEN and MALDONADO, JJ.
MALDONADO, J. (concurring).
I concur fully in the majority opinion. I write separately because, while I agree that there is insufficient authority upon which this Court could appropriately act, I share plaintiffs’ public policy concerns regarding the enforceability of these arbitration agreements. I agree with the concurring opinion in McMillon v Kalamazoo, 983 NW2d 79, 83; 983 NW2d 79 (2023) (WELCH, J., concurring), that “[t]he validity of contractually shortened limitations periods is an important issue to both employers and employees.” In my opinion, empowering employers to circumvent accountability for discriminatory practices by reducing the limitations period for proceeding with civil rights actions as a condition of employment is directly contrary to the purposes of the Elliot- Larson Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq. However, such a holding should be issued by the Supreme Court, not this Court. In November 2023, the Supreme Court conducted oral arguments1 to consider the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal this Court’s opinion in Rayford v American House Roseville I, LLC, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued December 16, 2021 (Docket No. 355232) (holding that a contractual limitations period imposed
See Rayford v American House Roseville I, LLC, 511 Mich 1010; 991 NW2d 199 (2023) (direction oral argument on application).
-1- by an employment agreement was enforceable). I hope the Supreme Court will use this opportunity to hold that such agreements are unenforceable as contrary to public policy.
/s/ Allie Greenleaf Maldonado
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.