Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan, 1869

Armstrong v. Fry

Armstrong v. Fry
Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan · Decided October 8, 1869 · Sutherland
1 Mich. N.P. 23

Counsel

Foot & Grout, for Appellee., J. Brousseau, for Appellant.

Armstrong v. Fry

Opinion of the Court

Sutherland, Judge.

Paragraph 3856, C. L. applies to such a case. The return having been made, it is conclusive evidence that the costs and fees have been paid. The “ costs of the justice” and “ such fees ” mentioned -in that section — “ the fee paid to the justice,” in § 3864, and “ the fees of the justice.” in sub. 6, § 3845, all refer to the moneys for fees and costs required to be paid by $ 3840, in order to appeal.

Motion denied, with usual motion costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.