Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan, 1883

Chapman v. Chapman

Chapman v. Chapman
Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan · Decided June 15, 1883 · Speed
1 How. N.P. 18

Counsel

■S'. W. Bui'roughs for the motion., Ward and Palmer against.

Chapman v. Chapman

Opinion of the Court

Tue Cotjut,

Speed, J.,

Held, that bills of review seek to review or re-examine causes upon their merits.

The present bill does not raise the question as to the merits of the former cause, but aims upon extrinsic facts to vacate the decree.

Although bills in the nature of bills of review, impeaching decrees for fraud, are sometimes inaptly called original bills in the nature of bills of review, (Story’s Eq. Pleading Sec. 426) I am satisfied that the bills referred to in rule 101 are such only as may technically be styled Bills of Review, or bills in the nature of Bills of Review.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.