Circuit Court of the 9th Circuit of Michigan, 1870

Sherman v. Davis

Sherman v. Davis
Circuit Court of the 9th Circuit of Michigan · Decided May 15, 1870 · Brown
1 Mich. N.P. 224

Counsel

J L. Hawes, Attorney for Plaintiff, and ', H. Ü. Briggs, Attorney for Defendant,

Sherman v. Davis

Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Brown, J.

Plaintiff asks costs for his witnesses *225who remained in attendance upon Court, notwithstanding the stipulation of counsel relative to'the call of the case. Nothing was said in the stipulation, about the attendance or non-attendance of witnesses. They might, for all that appears, have been here from a great distance, so that their traveling expenses, had they returned home, would have equalled their fees for their attendance through the term.

I think, in the absence of any express stipulation, the pre- ■ vailing party should recover his witness fees for the time they are in actual attendance upon Court. Let the costs in this ca&p be taxed accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.