Hardin v. Commissioner
Hardin v. Commissioner
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
JERRY HARDIN,
Plaintiff, Case No. 18-12051 v. Hon. Terrence G. Berg COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 13)
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s August 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) be DENIED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) be GRANTED. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo deter- mination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is
made.”
Id.The record reflects that no party has filed an objection to the Magistrate’s August 13, 2019 Report and Recommendation. Where neither party objects to the report, the district court is not
obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 149-52(1985). The Court will therefore adopt the
Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of August 13, 2019 as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge
Patti’s Report and Recommendation of August 13, 2019 is AC- CEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) is DENIED
and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 6, s/Terrence G. Berg 2019 TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of record were served on September 6, 2019. s/A. Chubb Case Manager
Reference
- Status
- Unknown