Mixon v. Trans Union Consumer Solutions
Mixon v. Trans Union Consumer Solutions
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
AQEEL MIXON [E-FILER], 2:19-CV-12282-TGB Plaintiff, vs. TRANS UNION CONSUMER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT SOLUTIONS, EXPERIAN AND RECOMMENDATION NATIONAL CONSUMER AND DISMISSING CASE ASSIST CENTER, CONSOLIDATED FROM 19- 13150; Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk’s January 30, 2020 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29), recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and that the pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) be terminated as moot. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file
written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.”
Id.Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to
independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 149- 52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of January 30, 2020 as this Court’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge
Hluchaniuk’s January 30, 2020 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b) and the pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is TERMINATED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED.
DATED this 25th day of February, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown