Barajas v. SAUL

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Barajas v. SAUL

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

CAROLYN BARAJAS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 20-CV-11219

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. /

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Anthony P. Patti pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued his report on August 10, 2021 recommending that this court deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636

(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1 Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

1 The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation, the Plaintiff’s [12] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendant’s [14] Motion for Summary judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 8, 2021

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, September 8, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (810) 292-6522

Reference

Status
Unknown