Wilson v. Michigan, State of

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Wilson v. Michigan, State of

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROGER WILSON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:21-cv-913 v. HON. JANET T. NEFF STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________/

ORDER

This is a civil action brought by pro se Plaintiff Roger Wilson against the State of Michigan and Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14). Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 15), a motion for default judgment (ECF No. 18), and a motion “for expedited resolution of the constitutionality of Michigan Compiled Law 750, 14 15” (ECF No. 21). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on July 29, 2022, recommending that this Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss and deny Plaintiff’s motions. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 15, 18, and 21) are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any objections. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601, 610-11

(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on

other grounds by Jones v. Bock,

549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12

(2007). A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Dated: August 16, 2022 /s/ Janet T. Neff JANET T. NEFF United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown