Griffin v. Hoffman
Griffin v. Hoffman
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
RANDLE GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-10359 Honorable Denise Page Hood v.
HOFFMAN, et al.,
Defendants. ________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#109], GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#101], and DISMISSING CAUSE OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Pro se Plaintiff filed this
42 U.S.C. § 1983lawsuit against multiple defendants. This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s Report and Recommendation dated January 3, 2023. [ECF No. 109] In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 101]. No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Finding no
error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Furthermore, as neither party has raised an objection to the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the parties have
waived any further objections to the Report and Recommendation. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231,
829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) (a party’s failure to file any objections waives his or her right to further appeal); Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 149(1985).
For the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated January 3, 2023 [ECF No. 109] is ADOPTED as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions
of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 101, filed September 13, 2022] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ cause of action is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS ORDERED. s/Denise Page Hood DENISE PAGE HOOD DATED: February 8, 2023 United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown