Brown-Mosby v. Gadwell

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Brown-Mosby v. Gadwell

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRELL BROWN-MOSBY, Case No. 22-10336

Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge

BRIDAN GADWELL, et al., Anthony P. Patti United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. ____________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JULY 31, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 27)

Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s July 31, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 27). Magistrate Judge Patti recommends granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal,

2012 WL 3639070

(E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27), GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and DISMISSES the

complaint with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Date: August 23, 2023 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown