Chaffin 975744 v. Huss
Chaffin 975744 v. Huss
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
MATTHEW CHAFFIN,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:22-cv-1 v. Hon. Hala Y. Jarbou ERICA HUSS, et al.,
Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDER On January 31, 2023, Magistrate Judge Maarten Vermaat issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that that the Court dismiss this case for failure to prosecute and failure to update his address (ECF No. 17). The R&R mailed to Plaintiff was returned to the Court marked “return to sender,” “inmate paroled” and “no forwarding address” (ECF No. 18). Even though the Plaintiff has not received a copy of the R&R, Plaintiff has been properly served under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As required by statute, the magistrate judge filed the R&R with the Court and mailed a copy to Plaintiff at his last known address. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (“the magistrate judge shall file his proposed findings and recommendations under subparagraph (B) with the court and a copy shall forthwith be mailed to all parties.”). Upon placing the R&R in the mail to Plaintiff's last known address, service was complete. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C). Plaintiff has a continuing obligation to apprise the Court of his current address. See W.D. Mich. LCivR. 41.1 (“Failure of a plaintiff to keep the Court apprised of his current address shall be grounds for dismissal for want of prosecution.”). After being served with a Report and Recommendation issued by a magistrate judge, a party has fourteen days to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see United States v. Sullivan,
431 F.3d 976, 984(6th Cir. 2005). Failure to file an objection results in a waiver of the issue and the issue cannot be appealed.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); see United States v. Sullivan,
431 F.3d 976, 984(6th Cir. 2005); see Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 155(1985) (upholding the Sixth Circuit's practice). No objections have been filed to date. Although Plaintiff's failure to file objections is a sufficient reason to adopt the R&R, this Court has reviewed the merits of the report and finds the magistrate judge’s reasoning and conclusions sound. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 17) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. A judgment will issue in accordance with this order.
Dated: February 17, 2023 /s/ Hala Y. Jarbou HALA Y. JARBOU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown