Long 349322 v. Munro
Long 349322 v. Munro
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
JUWAUN LONG,
Plaintiff, Case No. 2:21-cv-150 v. HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY A. MUNRO, et al.,
Defendants. ____________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Motions for summary judgment were filed by the Plaintiff (ECF No. 27) and the remaining two defendants, A. Munro and J. Laponsie (ECF No. 41). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 28, 2022, recommending that this Court grant Defendants’ motion as to Plaintiff’s official-capacity claims for monetary relief, deny Defendants’ motion as to the remaining claims, and deny Plaintiff’s motion. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 49) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 27) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s official-capacity claims for monetary relief against Defendants and those claims are DISMISSED. The remainder of the motion is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601, 610-11(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock,
549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12(2007).
Dated: March 15, 2023 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown