District Court, W.D. Michigan, 2023

McDuel v. Precision Property Management/West MI Rentals

McDuel v. Precision Property Management/West MI Rentals
District Court, W.D. Michigan · Decided September 19, 2023
McDuel v. Precision Property Management/West MI Rentals

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STEPHANIE MCDUEL, ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 1:23-cv-777 -v- ) ) Honorable Paul L. Maloney PRECISION PROPERTY ) MANAGEMENT/WEST MI RENTALS, ., ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is a report and recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 5). Because Plaintiff McDuel filed an amended complaint, the Court REJECTS the report and recommendation.

Plaintiff McDuel, proceeding without the assistance of counsel, requested leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. The Court granted that request. The Magistrate Judge reviewed the complaint and issued a report recommending that the Court dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim (ECF No. 5). At the conclusion of the report, the Magistrate Judge informed Plaintiff that any objections must be filed within 14 days (PageID.20). Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time, which the Court granted.

In lieu of objections, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 10). When filed, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. , 759 F.3d 601, 617 (6th Cir. 2014) (citing 6 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1476 (3d ed. 2010)); , 266 F. App’x 444, 448 (6th Cir. 2008).

The Court expresses no opinion about whether the amended complaint overcomes the problems identified in the report and recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: September 19, 2023 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.