District Court, E.D. Michigan, 2024

Khatri v. Dearborn Public School District

Khatri v. Dearborn Public School District
District Court, E.D. Michigan · Decided August 22, 2024
Khatri v. Dearborn Public School District

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AZAZHUSEN KHATRI ESTATE, et al., Case No. 23-12874 Plaintiffs, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge DEARBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Anthony P. Patti United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JULY 31, 2024 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 24) Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s July 31, 2024, Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 24). Magistrate Judge Patti recommends the court: (1) deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) without prejudice; (2) allow 30 days for the unrepresented Plaintiffs to obtain counsel; (3) allow 60 days for any Plaintiffs still in the lawsuit to file a third amended complaint; and (4) strike Plaintiffs’ improper second response brief, (ECF No. 23). Id., PageID.418. The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition.

Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 24), DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) without prejudice, and STRIKES Plaintiffs’ improper second response brief (ECF No. 23). Because Plaintiff Khatri can only represent himself, not his wife, child, or the undefined “estate,” the court also agrees that the unrepresented Plaintiffs should be given 30 days to find counsel. The court further agrees that, if no counsel has filed an appearance on behalf of Plaintiffs Anne, the Estate, or GK (and in the case of GK, if she has not alternatively filed a notice to proceed pro se) by September 21, 2024, they will be dismissed from this lawsuit without prejudice, pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 41.2. At that time, any Plaintiffs still in the lawsuit should be given an additional 60 days to file a third amended complaint, which must be filed by November 20, 2024. The court directs Plaintiffs to Judge Patti’s Report and Recommendation, which provided a thorough outline of the pleading requirements in federal court, as well as resources that may be of assistance, including the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Clinic. (ECF No. 24, PageID.433).

SO ORDERED.

Date: August 22, 2024 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.