Spiller v. Chrisman

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Spiller v. Chrisman

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

HAKIM SPILLER, Case No. 24-cv-12148 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. U.S. District Judge

TROY CHRISMAN, et al.,

Defendants. /

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT DEFICIENCY

Before the Court is Petitioner Hakim Spiller’s civil rights complaint filed under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Saginaw Correctional Facility in Freeland, Michigan. For the reasons stated below, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. On August 26, 2024, Chief Magistrate Judge David R. Grand signed an order of deficiency in this case because Plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee nor moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) The order required Plaintiff to file the proper documents or pay the filing fee within thirty days. (Id.) The order cautioned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. (Id.) A prisoner who wishes to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs in a civil complaint in federal court must file an affidavit of indigency and a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a).

Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed without prepayment of fees (ECF No. 4) but has not submitted a certified trust account statement. If an incarcerated person who does not pay the full filing fee fails to provide a certified

trust account statement, the district court must notify them of the deficiency, and the incarcerated person will then have thirty days to correct the error or to pay the full filing fee. Erby v. Kula,

113 F. App’x 74, 75-76

(6th Cir. 2004) (citing McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601, 605

(6th Cir. 1997)). If the prisoner does

not correct the deficiency, “‘the district court must presume that the prisoner is not a pauper,’ assess the full filing fee, and dismiss the case for want of prosecution.”

Id.

at 76 (citing McGore,

114 F.3d at 605

). By not providing the documentation

needed to proceed in forma pauperis or submitting the filing and administrative fees, Plaintiff failed to comply with the deficiency order. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file a new civil rights complaint under a new case number provided

that he pays the filing and administrative fees or files the necessary documentation to proceed without prepayment of fees. SO ORDERED.

Date: November 14, 2024 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown