Crimes v. Jordan

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Crimes v. Jordan

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL CRIMES, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-12123 Hon. Jonathan J.C. Grey v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman JORDAN, Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 33) Pro se plaintiff Michael Crimes filed this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

lawsuit

against defendants Jordan, alleging that Jordan violated his constitutional rights and retaliated against him by placing him in segregation and preventing him from seeing a doctor. (ECF No. 1). This

matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Kimberly Altman’s Report and Recommendation dated April 1, 2024. (ECF No. 33.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that

the Court grant Jordan’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) and dismiss Crimes’ cause of action due to Crimes’ failure to respond to the Court’s order to respond to the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 31), failure to participate in discovery, and failure to notify the Court of Crimes’ new

address after being released from custody. (See ECF No. 33.) (Id.) No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds

that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Finding no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in

its entirety. Furthermore, as neither party has raised an objection to the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the parties have waived any further objections to the Report and Recommendation. Smith

v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231,

829 F.2d 1370

, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) (a party’s failure to file any objections waives his or her right to further appeal); Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985).

For the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated April 1, 2024 (ECF No. 33) is ADOPTED as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jordan’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause of action is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. s/Jonathan J.C. Grey JONATHAN J.C. GREY Dated: May 2, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First-Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on May 2, 2024. s/ S. Osorio Sandra Osorio Case Manager

Reference

Status
Unknown