District Court, E.D. Michigan, 2025

Lockett v. LVNV Funding LLC

Lockett v. LVNV Funding LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan · Decided July 10, 2025
Lockett v. LVNV Funding LLC

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ARTHUR L. LOCKETT, and MAMIE L. LOCKETT, Plaintiffs, Case Number 24-12165 v. Honorable David M. Lawson Magistrate Judge David R. Grand LVNV FUNDING LLC, CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., US BANK NA, SCOTT & ASSOCIATES P.C., ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, JOHNSON MARK LLC, MICHAEL J. SCOTT, MATTHEW W. COOPER, LACIE ELIZABETH FRIEND, SEAN MORRISSEY, MATTHEW CLARK, VICTORIA BARBOZA, LAUREN JONES, and GREGORY JOHNSON, Defendants. _________________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 20, 2025 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) recommending that the Court screen the plaintiffs’ complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and dismiss it on its own motion for failure to state a claim. The plaintiffs’ allegations concerned the payment of a debt by plaintiff Mamie Lockett — who apparently suffers from some form of dementia — and connected legal proceedings in a Texas state court. However, Judge Grand could not discern any viable claim from the complaint, which spanned nearly 148 pages and appeared to focus primarily on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et. seq.

The deadline for filing objections to the report has passed, and no objections have been received. The plaintiffs’ failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge and will dismiss the complaint.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 14) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ complaint is DISMISSED. s/David M. Lawson DAVID M. LAWSON United States District Judge Dated: July 10, 2025

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.