James Harmon Adams v. Marquette Police Department, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

JAMES HARMON ADAMS, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-226 v. HON. JANE M. BECKERING MARQUETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/

ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 6) recommending dismissal of the Complaint (ECF No. 1). During the time provided for objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) states that “in reviewing a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district judge may . . . receive further evidence, or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” See Moore v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. 17-5363, 2018 WL 1612299, at *2 (6th Cir. Jan. 31, 2018).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Magistrate Judge to consider whether Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) affects the Magistrate Judge’s prior recommendations.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is DISMISSED as moot.

Dated: October 15, 2025 /s/ Jane M. Beckering JANE M. BECKERING United States District Judge