Gregory Hardy v. Genesse County Community Action Resource Department, et al.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Gregory Hardy v. Genesse County Community Action Resource Department, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY HARDY, Case No. 24-11190 Plaintiff, Honorable Linda V. Parker Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford v.

GENESSE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF NO. 43)

Plaintiff Gregory Hardy brings this pro se civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. ECF No. 1. The Honorable Linda V. Parker referred the case to the undersigned for all pretrial matters under

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). ECF No. 7. Hardy moves for leave to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 43. Hardy references his proposed amended complaint as being attached as “Exhibit A,” but no exhibits were attached.

Id.,

PageID.292. Thus, Hardy failed to include a proposed amended complaint with his filing, in violation of E.D. Mich. Local Rule 15.1, which states that “[a] party who moves to amend a pleading shall attach the proposed amended pleading to

the motion.” Though he is proceeding pro se, Hardy is required to follow the court’s procedural rules and assumes the risks and hazards that accompany self-representation. See Graham-Humphreys v. Memphis

Brooks Museum of Art, Inc.,

209 F.3d 552, 561

(6th Cir. 2001). The Court DENIES without prejudice Hardy’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Elizabeth A. Stafford ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD Dated: October 30, 2025 United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS

Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file objections with the assigned district judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

28 U.S.C. § 636

. “When an objection is filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the magistrate judge or a district judge.” E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that this document was served on counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on October 30, 2025.

s/Davon Allen DAVON ALLEN Case Manager

Reference

Status
Unknown