District Court, W.D. Michigan, 2026

Shannon T. Boyle v. United States Attorney General, et al.

Shannon T. Boyle v. United States Attorney General, et al.
District Court, W.D. Michigan · Decided January 2, 2026
Shannon T. Boyle v. United States Attorney General, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

SHANNON T. BOYLE, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-173 v. HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint on July 22, 2025. Defendants U.S. Attorney General and AUSA Alexis Sanford filed a motion to dismiss. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on November 25, 2025, recommending that this Court dismiss the case due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Dated: January 2, 2026 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.