District Court, W.D. Michigan, 2026

Sameer Siraj Mauro Bey v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., et al.

Sameer Siraj Mauro Bey v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., et al.
District Court, W.D. Michigan · Decided February 23, 2026
Sameer Siraj Mauro Bey v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc., et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SAMEER SIRAJ MAURO BEY, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:25-cv-1537 v. HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., et al., Defendants. ____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint on November 24, 2025. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on December 15, 2025. On January 28, 2026, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the action be dismissed upon initial screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for the same reasons the Court concludes that Plaintiff’s claims are properly dismissed, the Court also concludes that any issue Plaintiff might raise on appeal would be frivolous. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).

Accordingly, the Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Dated: February 23, 2026 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.