Michigan Superior Court, Detroit, 1882

Hurd v. Stone

Hurd v. Stone
Michigan Superior Court, Detroit · Decided January 22, 1882 · Chipman
1 How. N.P. 1

Counsel

Wm. Jff. Wells for the motion., JLillibridge & Latham against.

Hurd v. Stone

Opinion of the Court

The Court,

Chipman, J.,

denied the motion, and held that filing the affidavit and issuing the writ of garnishment at the time of filing the declaration and entering the rule to plead, was a compliance with the statute. The Court based its opinion upon the universal practice in the profession, rather than upon the strict construction of the statute, but did not intimate that a strict construction of the statute would have caused it to hold the other way.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.