United States v. Sundry Goods
United States v. Sundry Goods
Opinion of the Court
Replications etc.
And the said United States of America in replication and answer to the prayer and claim of the above named Isaac Bissell Junr & Henry Fitch in manner and form by them made and set forth, to the possession of and property in and to the above mentioned goods, wares & merchandizes, consisting of Lumber, Towit four thousand nine hundred & Sixty Eight feet of pine board, Three Thousand Two hundred and forty nine feet of pine Plank (Board measure) One Thousand Nine hundred and Seventy five feet of pine weather Board and Twelve packs of pine Shingles, Seized and detained by the above named Joseph Wilkinson, Collector of the Said United States Customs, for the District of Detroit, as in the above libel is set forth, say, that for any thing contained in and set forth by the said claim and answer of the said Isaac & Henry above mentioned, The said goods, wares and merchandizes, consisting of Lumber &c as set forth in the libel aforesaid, ought not to be given up to and restored to them the said Isaac & Henry. Because the sd United States say, That the said goods wares and merchandizes, consisting of Lumber, Towit, Four Thousand, nine hundred and sixty Eight feet of pine board, Three Thousand Two hundred and forty nine feet of pine Plank (board measure) one Thousand nine hundred and Seventy five feet of pine weather Board and Twelve packs of pine Shingles, were heretofore that is to say, upon the sixth day of July in the year of our Lord One Thousand Eight hundred and five, brought by water in a certain craft commonly called a raft, from a foreign port or place in his Britanic Majestys dominions in America, called upper Canada, to a port or place within the Said United States, To wit, the district of Detroit in the territory of Michigan above mentioned. Which Said Goods, Wares & Merchandizes, consisting of lumber last mentioned, and before the day of filing the aforesd Libel, To Wit, on the said sixth day of July in the year of our Lord One Thousand Eight hundred and five aforesd at and within the said District of Detroit, were wrongfully and without the cause of the sd Isaac & Henry in their answer set forth,
Deposition
A. filed in Court
A. [Case 4, Paper 4]
Territory of Michigan, to wit;
On this day Saturday, the third day of august, one thousand eight hundred five, at Detroit in the Territory of Michigan, personally appeared
The said Luther Cooley, of the age of thirty six years, farmer, being first duly sworn, according to law, deposes and says, that he assisted the said Fitch and Bissell on or about last day of June last, to bring over a quantity of boards from the British to the American side of Detroit river, and to land the same, that a quantity amounting as the deponent believes to twenty four thousand feet were landed below the town on, or about the last day of June, and a quantity amounting as this deponent believes to fourteen thousand feet were landed on the fourth day of July above the town, or at the upper end thereof; this deponent attended the raft in each instance from about half a mile above the house of Angus McIntosh on the British side, over to the American. The current not allowing them to get to shore above the town with the first quantity of twenty four thousand they landed below the town. In landing the second quantity they were forced by the wind up the river, and could not have got down to the place where the first quantity was landed. The raft in its original state was as rafts are usually made, very compact and firmly bound together. The reason why the whole was not brought over together was that they could not get hands enough to bring the whole the first time. A quantity of twelve or fourteen thousand feet was landed on the British side which this deponent understood from the said Fitch and Bissell not to be partnership property like the rest of the raft but in the special charge of Fitch. Each quantity landed on the' American side was put together completely in the manner of a raft. Before the second quantity was landed Isaac Bissell observed to the deponent he was dubious about taking it over without another permit, alledging that Doctor Wilkinson the collector was prejudiced against him and would lay hold of any irregularity. The deponent advised him that in his opinion another permit was not necessary. When taken over before there was any seizure the said Fitch requested this deponent while he was drawing them from the water to the land, and assorting them according to their lengths, that he would keep an exact account of them, as he the said Fitch would have to render an account of
Luther Cooley Augustus B. Woodward.
[In the handwriting of Solomon Sibley]
[In the handwriting of Augustus B. Woodward]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.