Conner v. Newcommer
Conner v. Newcommer
Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE TERRITORY OF MICHIGAN
Henry Conner & Francis Gray advs Tobias New Commer
In Case
Michigan Territory, to wit
And the said Henry & Francis by Sol. Sibley their Atty come and defend &c When &c and as to the whole of the said Tobias’ declaration aforesaid and the matter therein contained, except Fifty dollars part and parcel of the said sum of one Thousand dollars in the first count mentioned, say that they never did assume and promise the said Tobias in manner and form as the said Tobias hath thereof against them declared, and of this they put them- . selves on the Country.
And the said Henry & Francis, as to the said Fifty dollars part and parcel of the said One thousand dollars, in the first count of the said Tobias’ declaration, and by the said Henry arid Francis in their plea above excepted,
Michigan towit—
Henry Conner and Francis Gray put in their place and stead Sol. Sibley their Atty in the above pleas by them pleaded at the suit of Tobias New-commer &c.
[In the handwriting of Solomon Sibley]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.