Hugh Pattinson & Co v. May
Hugh Pattinson & Co v. May
Opinion of the Court
Territory of Michigan, to wit—
The United States to the Marshal of Michigan Greeting. Whereas Hugh Pattinson & Richard Pattinson, merchants in Company at Chicago, in Said territory, under the firm of Hugh Pattinson & C°, lately in our court before us, at Detroit, by our writ, and by the judgment of the Said Court recovered against Charles Chandonet eight hundred fifty Seven dollars Sixty nine yi Cents for their damages which they had sustained as well by reason of the trover and conversion of a certain quantity of merchandize by him the Said Charles Chandonet, the property of the Said Hugh Pattinson & C° at Chigcago aforesaid, as for their costs & charges by them about their Suit in that behalf expended, whereof the Said Charles is Convicted, as appears to us of record; and altho Judgment thereof be thereon given, yet execution of the damages aforesaid Still remains to be made to them the Said Hugh Pattinson & C°. And whereas James May of Detroit aforesaid lately (that is to Say) of September term in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred Six in our Said Court before us, at Detroit, came personally in his own proper person and became pledge and bail for the Said Charles Chandonet that he the Said Charles Should satisfy and pay the Condemnation of the Court or render his body in execution for the Same, or that he the Said James May would do it for him, as by the record of the Said
[In the handwriting of Peter Audrain]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.