Pattinson v. United States
Pattinson v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Territory of Michigan, to wit—
The United States of America to George McDougall Esquire, chief judge of the court of the district of Huron & Detroit, in Said territory.
Whereas we have lately been informed that in the record and process, and also in giving of judgment in a plaint which was in our Court before you and your associates, our judges of the Said district court by our writ betwen the Said United States of America, and Richard Pattinson, in a plea of debt, Manifest error has intervened to the great damage of the Said Richard Pat-tinson, which Said record & process, for the error aforesaid, we have caused to be brought into our court before us; and now on the behalf of the Said Richard we are informed in our Said court before us that at the trial & hearing of the cause betwen the Said parties in the plea aforesaid, the counsel learned in the law of the Said Richard offered unto the court his certain demurrer to the declaration of the Said United States alledging there in certain insufficiencies to the demand of the Said United States against the Said Richard Pattinson; which Said demurrer was nevertheless by the opinion of our Said district court rejected; and on the behalf of the Said Richard certain exceptions were there upon alledged to the opinion of the Said court
elk. S. C.
[In the handwriting of Peter Audrain]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.