Campau v. Williams
Campau v. Williams
Opinion of the Court
Territory of Michigan— in the district court of the territory for THE DISTRICT OF HURON & DETROIT OF THE TERM OF AUGUST IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED SIX-DISTRICT OF HURON & Detroit ss—John Williams Merchant was attached to answer unto Joseph
And whereas the said John Williams afterwards towit on the first day of August in the year of our Lord 1806 to wit at Detroit aforesaid in the Territory and District aforesaid was indebted to the said Joseph Campau in one other sum of eight hundred dollars of like lawful money of the United States for money by the said Joseph before that time laid out expended and paid for the said John and at his special instance and request and being so indebted he the said John in consideration thereof afterwards towit on the
And whereas the said John afterwards towit on the same day and year last aforesaid towit at Detroit aforesaid was indebted to the said Joseph in other sum of one thousand dollars of like lawful money of the United States for money by the said Joseph before that time lent and advanced to the said John and at his special instance and request and being so indebted he the said John in consideration thereof afterwards towit on the same day and year aforesaid towit at Detroit aforesaid undertook and faithfully promised the said Joseph to pay him the said Last mentioned sum of money when he the said John should be thereto afterwards requested— And whereas the said John afterwards towit on the same day and year aforesaid towit at Detroit aforesaid was indebted to the said Joseph in other sum of one thousand dollars of like lawful money for money by the said John before that time had had and recd to and for the use of the said Joseph and being so indebted he the said John in consideration thereof afterwards towit on the same day and year aforesaid towit at Detroit aforesaid undertook and faithfully promised the said Joseph to pay him the said last mentioned sum of money when he the said John should be thereunto afterwards requested—
Yet the said John in no wise regarding his aforesaid several promises and undertakings so by him made in his behalf as aforesaid but contriving and fraudulently intending craftily and subtally to deceive and defraud the said Joseph in this behalf hath not as yet paid the said Joseph the said several sums of money or any part thereof altho so to do he the said John was requested by the said Joseph afterwards towit on the same day and year last aforesaid and often afterwards towit at Detroit aforesaid but he to pay the same hath hitherto entirely refused and still doth refuse to the damage of the said Joseph Campau as he says .... dollars and thereof to recover the same with costs &c he brings suit &c and hath pledges towit E Brush Atty John Doe & Richd Roe
District aforesaid towit— Joseph Campau puts in his place E Brush his Atty agl John Williams in the Plea aforesaid—
[In the handwriting of Elijah Brush]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.