Brush v. Buckland
Brush v. Buckland
Opinion of the Court
Territory of Michigan in the district court of the district of HURON & DETROIT
William M. G. Buckland was attached to answer unto Elijah Brush in a plea of trespass on the case whereupon the said Elij ah in his own proper person complains for that whereas the said William on the 3otb day of March in the year of our Lord 1809 towit at Detroit in the District and Territory aforesaid made his certain note in writing commonly called a promisory note his own proper hand writing being thereunto subscribed and then and there delivered the said note to the said Elijah and thereby promised for Value recd to pay the said Elijah by the name of Elijah Brush or order by the fifteenth day of April next (meaning April next ensuing the date of said note) forty seven dollars twenty five cents By reason whereof the said
Bond Richd Smyth to James Wilson
filed in Court 6 octber 1809
[Case 218, Paper 1]
Know all men by these presents that I Richard Smyth of Detroit in the Territory of Michigan am held and firmly bound unto James Wilson of the Province of Upper Canada in the sum of three hundred fifty dollars money of the United States to be paid to the Said James Wilson his certain atty his Executors or administrators To which payment well and truly to be made and done I bind myselfe my heirs Executors and administraters by these presents signed with my hand and sealed with my seal at Detroit in the said Territory of Michigan this 5th day of Octr 1809—the condition of the above obligation is such that whereas one James McGarvy hath sued and prosecuted out of the Supreme Court of the Territory his certain writ of Error upon a Judgment rendered in the District Court of Huron & Detroit
E Brush -Nr-Benaparte ■ jx.
James McGarvin defendant
James Wilson plaintiff
filed 7 august 1807
E Brush attny for defendant
[Case 218, DC Paper 4]
Territory of Michigan
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF hurón & Detroit in the term of august 1807-
District of Huron & Detroit ss—And the Said James McGarvin by Elijah Brush his attorney comes and defends the wrong and injury when &c and Says that he did not undertake and promise, in manner and form as the Said James Wilson hath above thereof complained against him, and of this he puts himself upon his country, &c—And for further plea in this behalf— the Said James McGarvin by leave of the court here, for this purpose had and obtained, according to the form of the Statute in Such case made and provided Says that the Said James Wilson ought not to have or maintain his aforesaid action thereof against him the Said James McGarvin because he Saith that the Said Several causes of action in the Said Declaration mentioned did not, nor did any of them accrue to the Said James Wilson the plaintiff; at any time within the Space of five years next before the exhibiting the bill of the Said James Wilson; and this the Said James McGarvin is ready to verify. Wherefore he prays Judgment if the Said James Wilson ought to have or maintain his aforesaid action thereof against him &c—
E Brush Atty
James McGarvin puts in his place E Brush his attorney in the above plea and the Plff Likewise as to the plea above first pleaded—
Sol. Sibley
Note: The amount first written was “fifty dollars.”]
[In the handwriting of Elijah Brush]
[In the handwriting of Elijah Brush]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.