Conner v. Blackmar
Conner v. Blackmar
2 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 370
Conner v. Blackmar
Opinion of the Court
Territory of Michigan, to wit
Henry Conner Pltff vs Sylvanus Blackmar Dft
i respass vi et armis Damages $1,000
Endorse “This action is brought to recover damages sustained by the Plaintiff, by reason of the Defendant’s having trespassed upon the lands of the sd plaintiff, and taken and kept possession of his mills &c
Hickman. P. Q.
Please issue a capias as above returnable to next S. Court
Yrs
Septr 5. 1811— Harris H. Hickman
[In the handwriting of Harris H. Hickman]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.