Michigan Supreme Court, 1819

Anonymous

Anonymous
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided September 15, 1819
3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 131

Anonymous

Opinion of the Court

Application was made for a continuance of this case to the next Term, but it was contended the affidavit did not contain sufficient matter to warrant the application; and after much dispute, the court decided that on motions for continuances the following causes should be shown by the Affidavit:

Ist That there is a material witness in the case.

ad That such witness is absent from the Territory.

3d That the party has used due diligence to obtain his attendance; and this must be determined by a subpoena taken out and returned non est.

4th That he expects to obtain his attendance at the next Term of the court.

5th That he expects to prove a credit, or something material by the witness.

6th That he is a competent witness,

and 7th That the application is not made for the purpose of delay. —

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.