Michigan Supreme Court, 1824

André v. Ten Eyck

André v. Ten Eyck
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1824
3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 240

André v. Ten Eyck

Opinion of the Court

Journal Entries (1822-24): Journal3: (1) Rule for special bail or pro-cedendo *p. 299; (2) time for filing declaration extended *p. 357; (3) attendance of witness proved *p. 420; (4) jury impaneled *p. 427; (5) witnesses sworn *p. 427; (6) attendance of witnesses proved *p. 427; (7) verdict, jury polled *p. 430; (8) motion for new trial *p. 431; (9) motion for new trial overruled *p. 505; (10) motion for judgment *p. 506; (11) judgment *p. 511.

Papers in File: (i) Precipe for habeas corpus; (2) writ of habeas corpus and return; (3) recognizance and bail piece; (4) declaration; (5) plea of non assumpsit, notice of demand for bill of particulars, notice of set off and statement of accounts; (6) notice of taking deposition; (7-8) precipes for subpoenas; (9) subpoena; (10) precipe for subpoena; (11) subpoena; (12) precipe for subpoena duces tecum; (13) subpoena duces tecum; (14) deposition of Jacob Smith; (15) precipe for subpoena; (16) subpoena; (17) subpoena; (18) verdict; (19) reasons for new trial; (20) affidavit of Conrad Ten Eyck; (21) motion and reasons in arrest of judgment; (22) sheriff’s bill of fees; (23) precipe for fi. fa.; (24) writ of fi. fa. and return; (25) precipe for fi. fa.; (26) writ of fi. fa.; (27) memo, of costs paid; (28) memo, of costs; (29) assignment of judgment; (30) receipt for fees; (31) receipt for costs; (32-47) orders, vouchers, etc.

1822-23 Calendar, MS p. 24. Recorded in Book B, MS pp. 381-85.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.