Michigan Supreme Court, 1824

Ten Eyck v. Godfroy

Ten Eyck v. Godfroy
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1824
3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 318

Ten Eyck v. Godfroy

Opinion of the Court

Journal Entries (1824-26): Journal 3: (1) Rule to show cause against procedendo *p. 484. Journal 4: (2) Rule for judgment for costs MS p. 95.

*319Papers in File: (i) Precipe for habeas corpus; (2) writ of habeas corpus and return; (3) declaration; (4) demurrer; (5) joinder in demurrer; (6) satisfaction piece; (7) memo, re payment of fees; (8) receipt for attorney’s fee; (9) writ of ca. sa. for costs, receipt; (10) memo, re credit for payment of costs.

1824-36 Calendar, MS p. 34.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.