Michigan Supreme Court, 1836

Godfroy v. Robidoux

Godfroy v. Robidoux
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1836
5 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 80

Godfroy v. Robidoux

Opinion of the Court

Journal Entries (1827-30): Journal 4: (1) Motion to dissolve injunction and to dismiss bill *p. 126; (2) rule to plead, answer, or demur; copy of rule ordered published *p. 144; (3) motion for leave to demur, motion to take bill as confessed *p. 173; (4) appearance, demurrer filed, bill taken as confessed, demurrer set for argument, continued *p. 216; (3) demurrer argued *p. 292; (6) demurrer argued, submitted *p. 294; (7) demurrer overruled *p. 303; (8) motion to take bill as confessed *p. 318; (9) bill taken as confessed *p. 322; (10) decree *p. 369-

Papers in File: (i) Bill of complaint, fiat for injunction; (2) recognizance for injunction; (3) writ of subpoena and return; (4) receipt, proof of signature; (3) motion to dissolve injunction; (6) motion for notice by publication; (7) affidavit of non-residence; (8) proof of publication; (9) receipt for costs of publication; (10) motion to take bill as confessed; (11) demurrer to bill; (12) motion to set demurrer for argument; (13) motion to take bill as confessed; (14) decree signed by two of the judges; (13) writ of fi. fa. for costs.

Chancery Case 86 of 1827.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.