Glazier v. Vannatter
Glazier v. Vannatter
Opinion of the Court
Journal Entries (1830-35): Journal 4: (1) Motion to dissolve injunction *p. 409; (2) motion for leave to file supplemental bill *p. 417; (3)
Papers in File: (i) Bill of complaint, order for injunction; (2) copy of bill of complaint; (3) bond for injunction; (4) writ of injunction and return; (3) writ of subpoena and return; (6) writ of subpoena, acknowledgment of service; (7) answer of Henry B. Vannatter; (8) affidavits of George W. Postal, Champlin Green, Daniel Van Antwerp, James L. Young, Benjamin Horton, and Charles Larned; (9) motion to dissolve injunction; (10) motion for appointment of master to take testimony; (11) supplemental bill; (12) replication to answer of Henry B. Vannatter; (13) answer of William F. Moseley; (14) replication to answer of William F. Moseley; (13) motion to dismiss; (16) motion for extension of time to take testimony; (17) affidavit of Elisha Glazier in support of motion; (18) motion to dismiss; (19) master’s report transmitting depositions; (20) depositions of Benjamin Horton, Seth C. Young, and Charles C. Hascall; (21) motion to set aside order of dismissal; (22) affidavit of Elisha Glazier in support of motion.
Chancery Case 133 of 1830.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.