Michigan Supreme Court, 1836

United States v. Conant

United States v. Conant
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided July 1, 1836
5 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 190

United States v. Conant

Opinion of the Court

Journal Entries: (i) Oct. 3, 1821: continued by consent, rule for bill of particulars; (2) Sept. 21, 1822: motion for judgment; (3) Oct. 8, 1822: motion for judgment on transcript of account with United States, motion for judgment; (4) Oct. 9, 1822: motion for continuance granted; (5) Oct. 8, 1823: jury trial, verdict for plaintiff, motion by plaintiff for new trial; (6) Oct. 10, 1823: motion for new trial withdrawn, motion for judgment, judgment.

Papers in File (1821-25): (1) Precipe for summons; (2) summons and return; (3) precipe for subpoena; (4) subpoena; (5) declaration; (6) plea of non assumpsit; (7) affidavit for continuance; (8) precipe for subpoena; (9) subpoena; (10) motion and reasons for new trial; (11) affidavit for continuance; (12) subpoena; (13) precipe for fi. fa.; (14) writ of fi. fa., return, inquisition; (15) taxed bill of costs; (16) receipt— marshal to clerk; (17) statement of account— United States to Edward Farrell, receipt— Edward Farrell to Otis Fisher.

File No.....

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.