Seaman v. Auditor General
Seaman v. Auditor General
Opinion of the Court
To compel respondent to issue a warrant to relator for certain surplus moneys.
Denied 1844.
On a sale of land for taxes, relator became a purchaser and received the county treasurer’s certificate of sale, which, under the statute, entitled him to a deed in two years from the time of sale, unless the land was redeemed. Before the two years had expired the same land was again sold for the taxes of the following year, and the amount paid in exceeded the amount of the taxes, interest and charges. The excess was, under the statute,
Held, that he was not entitled to receive it, he not being the owner of the land within the meaning of the statute.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SEAMAN v. AUDITOR GENERAL
- Status
- Published