Pearson v. Creslin
Pearson v. Creslin
16 Mich. 281; 1868 Mich. LEXIS 3
Opinion of the Court
held that the proceedings before the commissioner being a unit, the order to quash must affect the entire case, and that unless a party follows up his petition with a citation, his proceeding will be considered as having been abandoned by him.
Ordered, that the proceedings be quashed as irregular and without jurisdiction, with costs to the plaintiff in error.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.