Torrent v. Muskegon Booming Co.
Torrent v. Muskegon Booming Co.
21 Mich. 159; 1870 Mich. LEXIS 80
Torrent v. Muskegon Booming Co.
Opinion of the Court
The Court held that, as in the case of McClintock v. Laing (19 Mich., 300), where the appeal bond was not ■approved by a proper officer, yet a new bond was allowed to be filed •, so in this case, a new bond may be filed on •the payment of $10 costs in this motion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.