Sammons v. Halloway
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sullivan v. Helli (Mich. 1925)
- Farmers Savings Bank v. Neel (Iowa 1922)
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Smiley (Ga. 1921)
- Amos-Richia v. Northwestern Mutual Life-Insurance (Mich. 1906)
- Wade v. Foss (Me. 1902)
- Magic Packing Co. v. Stone-Ordean Wells Co. (Ind. 1902)
- Watson v. Mirike (Tex. App. 1901)
- Small v. Slocumb (Ga. 1900)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Halloway sued Sammons upon a promissory note. Sammons defended on the ground that it was not sufficiently stamped under the United States revenue laws, and consequently was neither admissible in evidence, nor could a recovery be had upon it if admitted. The Circuit Judge ruled otherwise. We think this ruling correct.
We decided in the case of Clemens v. Conrad (19 Mich., 170) that the provision of the act of Congress which precluded unstamped instruments being received in evidence had no application to the state courts. We did not undertake to say what should be the effect of such instruments when received in evidence, because the case then before us did not call for such a decision. But it legitimately follows that if they are receivable in evidence, it is because when received they have a bearing upon the issue, which would not be the case if they were utterly void.
We have no doubt of the right of Congress to lay stamp duties, and to impose penalties, which may be
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.