Seely v. Howard
Seely v. Howard
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Seely brought ejectment, and in his declaration describes the premises as “ the following real estate or premises situated in the city of Port Huron, county of St. Clair, and being known and described as the undivided eighth
Held, That the description was sufficiently precise without reference to the Vandenburgh deed. The county and city are given, with the name of the tract of land, and it is clearly dis' tinguished 'from all other pieces of land. Writers and the authorities bold this description sufficient. Inasmuch as the description was held sufficient, the reference to the Vandenburgh deed was deemed immaterial in this relation.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Edwin R. Seely v. Henry Howard
- Status
- Published