Michigan Supreme Court, 1875

Crane v. Sumner

Crane v. Sumner
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided January 19, 1875
31 Mich. 199; 1875 Mich. LEXIS 43
Crane v. Sumner

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The Court

held that the notice of hearing was proper under rule 21, and if no new issue had been raised as pro*200vided for by rule 13, the eases would be properly on the docket; but that where after the notice a new issue is raised by plea in bar to the writ, this new issue must also be noticed for hearing before it cun be brought on to be heard; that a piecemeal submission of causes is not to be favored; and that the course of practice suggested by the counsel for plaintiff in error would lead to such confusion and uncertainty as to the real state of the term docket as would be embarrassing and objectionable.

Motion granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.