Michigan Supreme Court, 1875

Deyoe v. Jamison

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided November 2, 1875

33 Mich. 94; 1875 Mich. LEXIS 257

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

National Cash Register Co. v. Richards (Mich. 1909)
Cole v. Hines (Md. 1895)
Talbot v. Magee (Mo. Ct. App. 1894)
Marvin Safe Co. v. Emanuel (New York Court of Common Pleas 1888)
Pearl v. Garlock (Mich. 1886)
Waters v. Cox (Ill. App. Ct. 1878)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This case is covered by the previous decisions of this court. The first replevin suit only determined the right of Deyoe to the possession of the organ at that time, and Avas not inconsistent with the right of Delano or Jamison to recover possession when the remainder of the purchase price *96was paid or tendered. This right was not one which would be forfeited by mere' neglect to pay by the day named. And if Deyoe could have a right to terminate it in that event, there was evidence from which the jury might infer, as they did, that he had waived it by seeking to collect the balance afterwards. On the main point in the case reference is made to Preston v. Whitney, 23 Mich., 260; Johnston v. Whittemore, 27 Mich., 463; Giddey v. Altman, 27 Mich., 209. There was sufficient evidence connecting the two plaintiffs in error with the detention, to warrant their being joined as defendants.

‘ The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.