Michigan Supreme Court, 1876

Sprague v. Soule

Sprague v. Soule
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided October 13, 1876 · Marston, Other
35 Mich. 35; 1876 Mich. LEXIS 227
Sprague v. Soule

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Marston, J.:

A bill of interpleader is a bill filed for the protection of a person from whom several persons claim legally or equitably the same thing, debt, or duty; but who has incurred no independent liability to any of them, and does not himself claim an interest in the matter. — Adams’ Eq., 202. And it is essential, among other things that the party seeking relief has incurred no independent liability to either claimant.— Id., 204. In this case the bill alleges that *complainant incurred the liability under an express agreement with some of the parties against whom he now claims relief. *35Such being the ease he is not entitled to the relief he now seeks.

The decree dismissing the hill must he affirmed, with costs.

The other justices concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.