Brownell v. Groesbeck

Michigan Supreme Court
Brownell v. Groesbeck, 36 Mich. 501 (Mich. 1877)
1877 Mich. LEXIS 181

Brownell v. Groesbeck

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This case was not argued on the part of the defendant in error.

It clearly appears that hearsay evidence was admitted under objection, and for this the judgment must be reversed. Some other questions appear in the record, but we prefer, in the absence of any necessity for doing so, not to consider them on an ex parte presentation.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and a new trial ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name
Henry J. Brownell v. Keziah M. Groesbeck
Status
Published