People ex rel. Warner v. Randall
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Okrie v. State (Mich. Ct. App. 2014)
- In re Press Printers & Publishers (3d Cir. 1926)
- Babcock Printing Press Mfg. Co. v. Murphy (3d Cir. 1926)
- State ex rel. Lytle v. Superior Court (Wash. 1909)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Application for a mandamus. The respondent is one of the circuit court commissioners of Wayne county. An order of reference in a foreclosure case has been tendered to him for execution, and he has declined to proceed under it on the ground that as he has not been designated by the circuit judge to perform the duties of injunction master, he is precluded by the act of 1877 entitled “an act to provide for the reference of certain causes in chancery involving an accounting between the parties,” (Public Laws 1877, p. 76) from acting under such an order.
We think the respondent is in error. The exact purpose and scope of the act in question, may be open to controversy, but we think only those cases are within its terms where the bill is filed for'an accounting, and a reference is ordered to take and state an account. Mortgage cases are not of that class, and a reference to ascertain the amount due on the securities or any other interlocutory reference in a case not instituted for an accounting is not within the contemplation of the act referred to.
The writ must issue.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.