Markham v. Gehan
Markham v. Gehan
42 Mich. 74; 3 N.W. 262; 1879 Mich. LEXIS 706
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Meier v. Blair (Mich. 1938)
- Battjes Fuel & Building Material Co. v. Milanowski (Mich. 1926)
- Nachtegall v. Reilley (Mich. 1911)
- Van Bianchi v. Wayne Circuit Judge (Mich. 1900)
- Kennedy v. McLellan (Mich. 1889)
- Trickett v. Moore (Kan. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It appears in the record beyond^ any controversy that the demand owing by defendants, and which the plaintiff seeks to recover from them as garnishees, was due not to the principal defendant alone, but to him and another person with whom he was joint contractor for building a church. There was therefore no ground for a recovery, and the judgment in favor of defendants must be affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.