Printz v. People
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Clemons (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)
- Stern v. United States. Giordano v. United States (6th Cir. 1953)
- Duma v. Janni (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
- Gloeser v. Moore (Mich. 1938)
- Allen v. Commonwealth (Ky. Ct. App. 1912)
- Withey v. Pere Marquette Railroad (Mich. 1905)
- State v. Maggard (Mo. 1901)
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Palmer (Neb. 1898)
- McMahon v. City of Dubuque (Iowa 1898)
- Alt v. California Fig Syrup Co. (Nev. 1885)
- Yost v. Conroy (Ind. 1883)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The witness, Mary McKenzie, was competent to give the, value of her seal-skin cloak. It was part of her personal apparel, which she had worn one winter. She testified that she had priced such articles, and that this one was certainly worth one hundred and twenty-five dollars. The evidence was regular and within previous decisions. It was not necessary to call dealers in second-hand furs.
The remaining objection is covered by Cummins v. The People, just decided, ante, p. 142.
There is no error and the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.