Holmes v. Bronson
Michigan Supreme Court
Holmes v. Bronson, 43 Mich. 562 (Mich. 1880)
6 N.W. 89; 1880 Mich. LEXIS 866
Graves, Other
Holmes v. Bronson
Opinion of the Court
We are unable to make any distinction in principle between this case and Morrison v. Berry 42 Mich. 389.
Bo far as any difference is discoverable in the- facts, it is not to the advantage of the plaintiffs in error. And see Newcomb v. Andrews 41 Mich. 518; Vanneman v. Powers 56 N. Y. 39; Woodruff Iron Works v. Adams 37 Conn. 233; Wright v. Hood 49 Wis. 235.
The judgment must be affirmed with costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert Holmes and Edwin F. Webster v. Laura E. S. Bronson
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published