Holmes v. Bronson
Holmes v. Bronson
43 Mich. 562; 6 N.W. 89; 1880 Mich. LEXIS 866
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Minot Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Bach (N.D. 1919)
- Armstrong v. Backus (Mich. 1917)
- Detroit Lumber Co. v. Cleff (Mich. 1910)
- Popp v. Connery (Mich. 1904)
- Fechheimer v. Peirce (Mich. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We are unable to make any distinction in principle between this case and Morrison v. Berry 42 Mich. 389.
Bo far as any difference is discoverable in the- facts, it is not to the advantage of the plaintiffs in error. And see Newcomb v. Andrews 41 Mich. 518; Vanneman v. Powers 56 N. Y. 39; Woodruff Iron Works v. Adams 37 Conn. 233; Wright v. Hood 49 Wis. 235.
The judgment must be affirmed with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.