Holmes v. Bronson

Michigan Supreme Court
Holmes v. Bronson, 43 Mich. 562 (Mich. 1880)
6 N.W. 89; 1880 Mich. LEXIS 866
Graves, Other

Holmes v. Bronson

Opinion of the Court

Graves, J.

We are unable to make any distinction in principle between this case and Morrison v. Berry 42 Mich. 389.

Bo far as any difference is discoverable in the- facts, it is not to the advantage of the plaintiffs in error. And see Newcomb v. Andrews 41 Mich. 518; Vanneman v. Powers 56 N. Y. 39; Woodruff Iron Works v. Adams 37 Conn. 233; Wright v. Hood 49 Wis. 235.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert Holmes and Edwin F. Webster v. Laura E. S. Bronson
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published