Michigan Supreme Court, 1881

Marx v. Hilsendegen

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided June 22, 1881 · Marston, Other

46 Mich. 336; 9 N.W. 439; 1881 Mich. LEXIS 591

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Helwig v. Lascowski (Mich. 1890)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Marston, C. J.

There was no error in sustaining the objection made to the question asked the witness Fecht on cross-examination. Bissell v. Starr 32 Mich. 299.

*338Tbe court very properly denied defendant, during tbe trial, tbe privilege of tben interposing tbe plea of tbe statute of limitations in defence of tbe plaintiffs claim. To bave permitted tliis under the circumstances would bave been gross injustice to tbe plaintiff

There was evidence tending to show that Marx bad collected this money. Tbe case was fairly submitted and tbe judgment must be affirmed with costs.

Tbe other Justices concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.