Hagar v. Coup
Michigan Supreme Court
Hagar v. Coup, 50 Mich. 54 (Mich. 1883)
14 N.W. 698; 1883 Mich. LEXIS 715
Marston, Other
Hagar v. Coup
Opinion of the Court
¥e are of opinion that under the Act of 1879 and the case of Bagley v. Pridgeon 42 Mich. 551, residence of at least one of the parties in the city of Detroit is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the Superior Court, and that the parties cannot confer jurisdiction where none is given by the statute. Any other view would enable parties, if so disposed, to submit to and bring into that court all classes of personal actions from any part of the State.-
If the appellees disputed the right of counsel to sue out
The judgment must be reversed with.costs of both courts.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Wm. D. Hagar and Wesley L. Jukes v. William C. Coup
- Cited By
- 12 cases
- Status
- Published